Constructing Observations | The AGC Blog

Results Found: 6 RSS Feed
Hugh J. Gorman, III, Prince Lobel
Monday, August 21, 2017
Did a problem subcontractor just place an unjustifiable lien on a project for an important repeat client? What can you do to make sure the project and client's interests are protected?  AGC MA member Attorney Hugh J. Gorman, III of Prince Lobel discusses the use of a Lien Bond as possible tool a general contractor can use to sustain project momentum and relieve an owner's concerns. Read more
(0) Comments
Stan Martin | Commonsense Construction Law
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Indemnity. In the panoply of contract terms, no other word strikes as much terror into the hearts of contract administrators, project managers and other business types. This fear is often born of the failure to understand the essential elements and parameters that are typically hidden in a thicket of enormous run-on sentences. Read more
(0) Comments
Stan Martin | Commonsense Construction Law
Tuesday, July 26, 2016
A Massachusetts trial court has held that a public authority, which inadvertently prequalified an electrical contractor who did not have the proper license, can override its own prequalification decision and reject a bid from the contractor. The contractor was tripped up by a contract requirement that a corporate applicant must have a board member with the requisite license. In this instance, the contractor had one or more employees with a master electrician’s license, but did not have a board member with such a license, at least in Massachusetts. Read more
(0) Comments
Stan Martin | Commonsense Construction Law
Thursday, June 9, 2016
Lawyers hate this question. A contractor and subcontractor, having gone back and forth on a few contract terms while the sub is performing work, reach the end of the project – or at least the end of the sub’s work – without an agreed contract form. What happens? Lawyers hate the question because clients hate the answer: it depends. There is no “one size fits all” answer to this question. Read more
(0) Comments
Stan Martin | Commonsense Construction Law
Tuesday, February 9, 2016
The general standard in OSHA cases is that a foreman’s knowledge of a safety violation by a subordinate is imputed to the employer. An exception has been carved out by some courts when it is the foreman’s own safety violation that gives rise to the OSHA citation, and the employer argues that the actions of a “rogue” employee should not be imputed to the employer. But what happens when both foreman and subordinate engage in an unsafe work condition? That was the situation decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Quinlan v. Sec’y, United States DOL, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 207 (Jan. 8, 2016), available here. Read more
(0) Comments
Stan Martin | Commonsense Construction Law
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
Believing actual quantities of rock removal would be far less than the engineer’s estimate, the contractor bid a penny per cubic yard of rock removal on a water main extension project. Of course, other bid items could then be inflated and yet the contractor would – and did – remain the low overall bidder. Read more
(0) Comments